- Template item

The top tools for monitoring brand visibility in ChatGPT are Profound, Otterly.AI, AthenaHQ, Peec AI, Semrush AI Toolkit, Ahrefs Brand Radar, HubSpot AI Search Grader, and BrandRank.AI. For a solo marketer or founder running a first audit, HubSpot's free AI Search Grader is the right starting point. For a marketing team of 5 to 20 that wants weekly prompt tracking and competitor benchmarking, Otterly.AI or Peec AI cover most needs. For enterprise teams that need multi-engine coverage across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Copilot, Profound and Ahrefs Brand Radar are the two serious options. Each tool measures roughly the same metric (how often a model surfaces your brand for category-relevant prompts), but coverage, pricing, and reporting depth vary by an order of magnitude.
You picked this article because you've already noticed the problem: a category-defining query gets typed into ChatGPT, your brand isn't named, and a competitor is. That's the visibility gap. A monitoring tool is the first piece of fixing it. The next piece is content execution, and that part, no tool will do for you.
What should your marketing team cost in 2026?
Answer 6 questions and get a benchmarked team cost for your stage and industry in 90 seconds.
Calculate your team cost →What "brand visibility in ChatGPT" actually means
Brand visibility in ChatGPT is the rate at which the model names your brand inside answers to category-relevant prompts, plus the context around those mentions: which competitors are named alongside you, whether the mention is positive or negative, and which web sources ChatGPT cited to ground its answer. It's the closest LLM equivalent to share of voice in traditional search and is now a tracked deliverable for an SEO expert embedded in your marketing team.
Four sub-metrics matter, and the tools below report them in slightly different language:
- Mention rate. Across a fixed set of category prompts, what percentage of answers name your brand?
- Share of voice. When ChatGPT lists multiple brands in one answer, what's your share of the named set?
- Sentiment. Is the mention favorable, neutral, or critical?
- Citation source share. Which URLs did ChatGPT cite to back up the answer, and are any of them yours?
The reason this matters is buyer behavior. Search Engine Land has tracked the shift through 2025 and 2026: B2B buyers now use ChatGPT and Perplexity for early-stage vendor discovery before they hit Google. If your brand isn't named in those answers, you've already lost the consideration round before the prospect ever sees a SERP. Search Engine Journal reports similar shifts in B2C product research.
That makes "ChatGPT visibility" a real growth metric, not a vanity one. You should be tracking it the same way you track branded-search impressions in Google Search Console: weekly, with a competitor baseline.
How the tools were evaluated
Each tool below was scored against five criteria, the same ones a stretched marketing leader (or a content marketing expert running point on AEO) uses when picking any new piece of stack:
- Coverage breadth. Does it track ChatGPT only, or ChatGPT plus Perplexity, Gemini, Claude, and Copilot?
- Accuracy of citation detection. Does it surface the actual URLs ChatGPT used to ground each answer? This is the hardest part of AI search monitoring, and cheaper tools skip it.
- Pricing transparency. Is the entry price published, or do you have to book a call? Transparent pricing matters at the team-of-5 stage.
- Reporting depth. Sentiment, source share, competitor benchmarking, prompt-level drilldowns.
- Time-to-value. How long from sign-up to a first useful report (hours, days, or weeks)?
The rankings below come from vendor documentation, public pricing pages, hands-on use across MarketerHire's marketer network, and pattern-matching across thousands of client briefs.
The 8 best tools for monitoring brand visibility in ChatGPT
These eight tools dominate the buyer-side conversations happening on Reddit's r/ProductMarketing thread, in Slack groups for B2B marketers, and inside the briefs MarketerHire's vetted marketers are running for clients. Two tables (one for fit, one for pricing), then a short profile of each.
Coverage & best fit
| Tool | Engines covered | Best fit |
|---|---|---|
| Profound | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, Google AI Overviews | Enterprise teams, multi-engine programs |
| Otterly.AI | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews | Mid-market in-house teams |
| AthenaHQ | ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude | Brand teams running multi-LLM audits |
| HubSpot AI Search Grader | ChatGPT | Solo marketers running a first audit |
Beyond these four, Peec AI fits sentiment-heavy programs (PR-adjacent teams), Semrush AI Toolkit works best if you already pay for Semrush, Ahrefs Brand Radar is the right pick for an Ahrefs Enterprise customer, and BrandRank.AI is the niche pick for entity-influence work.
Pricing & starting point
| Tool | Entry price | Pricing model |
|---|---|---|
| HubSpot AI Search Grader | Free | One-time audit |
| Otterly.AI | ~$29/mo | Monthly subscription |
| Peec AI | ~$89/mo | Tiered by prompt volume |
| Profound | Enterprise (quote) | Annual contract |
Semrush AI Toolkit is bundled into Semrush plans starting around $140/mo; AthenaHQ and BrandRank.AI publish quote-only enterprise pricing. Prices listed are the smallest paid tier visible on each vendor's site as of June 2026. Confirm directly before purchase, since this category re-prices roughly every quarter.
Profound
Profound is the enterprise-tier choice. It covers ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Copilot, and Google AI Overviews in one dashboard, surfaces the URLs each engine cited, and gives competitor benchmarking out of the box.
Best for: brands with $50M+ in revenue and a dedicated AEO program. Profound's customers are typically running it next to Botify or Conductor on the SEO side. Pricing is annual and quote-only, with a five-figure floor. If you're earlier stage, Profound will outscope your needs and your budget. The honest pick is Otterly or HubSpot's free grader until you've justified a dedicated AEO line item.
Otterly.AI
Otterly.AI is the mid-market sweet spot. Set up a list of prompts, get weekly snapshots of mentions, sentiment, and competitor share. Coverage is ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews, which is enough for most B2B and DTC programs through 2026.
Best for: in-house marketing teams of 5 to 20. Pricing starts around $29/mo for a starter tier and scales by prompt count and refresh cadence. The reporting is clean, the prompt editor is fast, and the time-to-first-report is hours, not weeks. Limitation: no Gemini or Claude coverage at the time of writing, so if your buyers research in Google's AI Mode or Claude, you'll have blind spots.
AthenaHQ
AthenaHQ covers four LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude) and leans into multi-engine reporting. The strongest piece is the brand-vs-competitor topical breakdown: which topics is your brand winning, which is each competitor owning, and where's the white space.
Best for: brand teams and PR-adjacent marketers who care about narrative, not just count. Pricing is quote-based. AthenaHQ is also the right choice if you're running a "name share" audit before a rebrand or category re-entry, since the breadth of LLM coverage matters more than weekly granularity in that use case.
The Freelance Revolution Report
How thousands of companies are building hybrid marketing teams — data from 30,000+ MarketerHire hires. Free PDF.
Get the full report →Peec AI
Peec AI leads with sentiment and competitive benchmarking. The dashboard ranks mentions by tone (positive, neutral, critical) and tracks each named competitor inside the same answer. For PR teams, this is the closest LLM equivalent to a Cision-style sentiment monitor.
Best for: communications and brand teams. Entry pricing is around $89/mo for the smallest tier, scaling by prompt count and team seats. Peec's gap is on the citation side: it surfaces named brands cleanly, but its detection of the underlying source URLs ChatGPT cited is thinner than Profound's. Pair it with a citation tool if source attribution matters to your reporting.
Semrush AI Toolkit
Semrush's AI Toolkit is bundled into existing Semrush plans starting around $140/mo. If you already pay for Semrush for traditional SEO, the AI toolkit is the cheapest incremental upgrade: no second vendor, no new contract.
Best for: SEO teams already inside the Semrush stack. The toolkit covers ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews, with sentiment and a competitor view that mirrors Semrush's classic Position Tracking UI. Limitation: depth is shallow compared to dedicated tools. If AEO is a serious priority, treat this as a starter, not a finish line.
Ahrefs Brand Radar
Ahrefs Brand Radar is the equivalent move inside the Ahrefs product suite and lives inside Ahrefs Enterprise. Coverage is ChatGPT, Perplexity, and AI Overviews, with Ahrefs' standard hyper-clean URL-level reporting.
Best for: enterprise SEO teams already running Ahrefs. The reporting tradition Ahrefs is known for (clean data, fast filtering, exportable everything) carries straight into Brand Radar. Brand Radar isn't available on the smaller Ahrefs plans, so the entry point is the Ahrefs Enterprise contract, which means you're already a heavy Ahrefs shop before this tool makes sense.
HubSpot AI Search Grader
HubSpot's AI Search Grader is the free entry point. Drop in your domain and a target topic, and it returns a one-shot audit of how ChatGPT describes your brand and which competitors get named alongside you.
Best for: solo marketers, founders, and anyone running a first audit before committing budget. The grader is a one-time snapshot, not a tracking platform. There's no weekly cadence, no prompt library, no sentiment timeline. But for $0, it tells you whether you have a problem at all. Start here if you've never measured this before.
BrandRank.AI
BrandRank.AI is the niche pick. It scores entity-level influence inside LLM answers, not just whether you're mentioned, but how authoritatively the model treats your brand as a source of truth on a topic.
Best for: brands actively working on entity SEO and knowledge-graph positioning. Pricing is enterprise-quote. The honest read: BrandRank.AI is excellent at what it does, but most teams don't need this depth until after they've already moved the baseline mention rate. Get visible first, then optimize the authority score.
How to pick the right tool for your team size and stage
Pick based on three inputs: team size, current visibility baseline, and budget. There's no universally best tool — the right pick changes with stage. A solo marketer starting from zero needs a free grader; a 40-person growth team needs multi-engine tracking with sentiment and competitor benchmarking. Match the tool to the question you're trying to answer this quarter.
- Solo marketer or founder. Start with HubSpot's AI Search Grader. Free, one-shot, tells you whether your brand is even on ChatGPT's radar. If the grader returns "not mentioned," you have a content gap to close before paying for a tracking subscription.
- In-house team of 5 to 20. Otterly.AI at $29 to $99/mo covers most needs: weekly snapshots, competitor share, sentiment. Add Peec AI if PR and sentiment are formal KPIs.
- Mid-market growth team (20 to 50 marketers, $20M to $50M revenue). AthenaHQ for breadth, Semrush AI Toolkit if you're already a Semrush shop, or Ahrefs Brand Radar if you're already on Ahrefs Enterprise. Budget $500 to $2,000/mo.
- Enterprise (50+ marketers, dedicated AEO program). Profound is the default. Pair with BrandRank.AI for entity-level work if you have a knowledge-graph specialist.
If you can't decide between two tools at the same tier, pick the one with the broader engine coverage. Single-engine tools age fast as buyer behavior fragments across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Claude.
What the tool can't do for you
A monitoring tool detects invisibility. It does not fix it. That gap is the entire reason this category exists, and the reason most teams who buy a tracker still don't move their mention rate twelve weeks later.
To actually become visible inside ChatGPT and Perplexity, you need three things working together: original, citable content that names your category and your point of view; structured data so engines can extract it cleanly; and authoritative third-party references that point at you as the source. That's content strategy, technical SEO, and digital PR — three disciplines, none of which a dashboard runs for you.
This is where MarketerHire's customers usually re-staff. Once a tool tells you you're invisible for "best [your category]" prompts, you need either an in-house SEO/content lead who's already operating in the AEO playbook, or a fractional expert who's done it for similar companies. Hire an SEO expert or a content marketing expert who's run this specific play before. The 30,000+ matches MarketerHire has run since 2018 surface the same pattern: the teams who win at AEO are the ones who paired a measurement tool with senior execution inside the first 30 days. The teams who buy only the tool stay invisible.
If you're not ready to staff yet, the next-best move is to repurpose existing content for AI search. Structured Q&A pages, comparison tables, and authoritative citations are the LLM-friendly format. Most blog content can be re-shaped that way without a full rewrite. The SEO skills that matter in 2026 breakdown covers what to look for in either a hire or an outsourced partner.
Book a 20-minute intro call
Walk through your team gaps with a MarketerHire matching expert. We'll sketch the roles you actually need and surface vetted candidates.
Book a call →- 1 AI marketing tools we recommend for 2026
- 2 How to outsource your SEO function in 2026
- 3 Hire a vetted SEO expert in 48 hours

